When related to his conception of nature and society, Henri Lefebvre's concept of autogestion indicates the possibilities for a radical response to the social-ecological crises of capital in the twenty first century. Reuniting his radical critique of the capitalist production of space with his theorization of autogestion as a radical praxis aimed at total transformation offers a corrective to common, speculative appropriations of the former, while offering valuable insight into Lefebvre's observations regarding the centrality of the reappropriation of space to any genuinely radical project. Moreover, relating these concepts to his conception of nature-society and his engagement with what is now known as Marx's theory of metabolic rift indicates how a radical reappropriation of space, time, and the body also entails a transformation of humanity's relationship and metabolic interchange with the rest of nature.
30 March 2022
16 November 2021
Antinomies of space and nature or an open totality? Neil Smith and Henri Lefebvre on nature and society
Prior to recent, systematic engagement with the whole of his corpus, geographical appropriation of the thought of Henri Lefebvre has tended to be been fragmentary and eclectic. This is aptly illustrated in Neil Smith's paradoxical claim that his production of nature thesis was inspired by Lefebvre's work on the production of space even as Smith rejected or misunderstood most of what Lefebvre actually said while reworking the production of space into an epiphenomenon of the production of nature. This paper is one of several that ramified out of our call to re-evaluate Lefebvre's conception of the nature-society dialectic in geography, and compare it and contrast it to other understandings and theorizations of the problematic. In this paper, we focus primarily on interrogating Smith's influential portrayal of Lefebvre's thought on the dialectics of nature and society, reconsider Lefebvre's discussion of the domination of nature---a category on which much of Smith's thesis pivots---, and how Lefebvre's grasp of what is now referred to as Marx's theory of metabolic rift offers an alternative route to a spatial-ecological critique of capital than various attempts to "ecologize" David Harvey's theory of spatial fix.
10 December 2020
Sustainability and Metabolic Revolution in the Works of Henri Lefebvre
A paper that we wrote, based on a study of the translated portion of Henri Lefebvre's corpus, on the potential insights that his conception of the oppositional unity of nature-society offers into questions of sustainability, was just published in World. The paper looks primarily at Lefebvre's relation to contemporary issues of sustainability in terms of three central themes: the urban revolution, autogestion, and the critique of everyday life and the notion of total revolution. The hope is to stimulate further thought and discussion, as well as consideration of how other aspects of Lefebvre's work could be brought to bear on a radical project of sustainability in the context of a comprehensive social transformation.
26 December 2019
An ecological-Marxist response to the Half-Earth Project
DOI: 10.4103/cs.cs_19_99
30 May 2019
Making Space in Critical Environmental Geography for the Metabolic Rift
25 January 2019
Geographic rift in the urban periphery
03 October 2018
Half-Earth: A biodiversity ‘solution’ that solves nothing
30 April 2018
Ecological Marxism vs. environmental neo-Malthusianism
13 April 2018
Has (even Marxist) political ecology really transcended the metabolic rift?
07 December 2017
Grassroots Innovation Using Drones for Indigenous Mapping and Monitoring
17 November 2017
The Role of Geographical Landscape Studies for Sustainable Territorial Planning
11 October 2017
The prospects of terrace agriculture as an adaptation to climate change in Latin America
16 March 2017
Fundamentos de ecología política: Acumulación por reprodución amplia y sus contradicciones
-
Rosa Luxemburg. 1951. The Accumulation of Capital. Chapters 1 & 32.
-
El sistema capitalista es el único en que la producción puede parar a pesar de la disponibilidad de los medios de producción y la mano de obra
-
Una sobra de capital y mano de obra sin una forma para combinarlos para generar ganancias
-
-
También, es el única en que se puede tener una crisis de sobreproducción mientras no satisface las necesidades de los personas
-
La ganancia es lo que determina la producción, o, más especifico, la creación y realización de plus-valor (véase abajo)
-
La producción es por productores aislados sin un plan y coordinación
-
¿Cómo demonios es posible la reproducción en estas condiciones?
15 March 2017
Fundamentos de ecología política: Materialismo histórico
Notas para discusión: Materialismo histórico
-
Peet, Richard. 1991. “Historical materialism,” capítulo 5 de Global Capitalism: Theories of Societal Development. New York: Routledge.
-
Harvey, David. 2001. “On the history and present condition of geography: an historical materialist manifesto,” capítulo 6 de Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography, New York: Routledge.
-
Harnecker, Marta. 1969. Los Conceptos Elementales del Materialismo Histórico. Primera edición (México). 260 pp. México: Siglo veintiuno editores, S. A.
-
“Shit does not just happen: An introduction to Historical Materialism” (“La mierda no sólo sucede: Una introducción al materialismo histórico”). r21 – revolutionary socialism in the 21st century. YouTube: https://youtu.be/Ot3_Gs1UhFg
14 November 2015
Spatial Fix and Metabolic Rift as Conceptual Tools in Land-Change Science
Spatial Fix and Metabolic Rift as Conceptual Tools in Land-Change Science.
Capitalism Nature Socialism: Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 198-214.
doi: 10.1080/10455752.2015.1104706